Olympic Sculpture Park Monitoring - Yr 5
#11-1671 #11-1671
Organization Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed (WRIA 9) Lead Entity
Sponsor Seattle Public Utilities
Status Completed
Schedule Start Date: 6/1/2011 End Date: 12/11/2012
Category Category: Planning
DESCRIPTION
The Seattle Art Museum’s Olympic Sculpture Park opened in January 2007 at a site along the city of Seattle’s urbanized marine shoreline. In order to provide benefits for juvenile salmon and other biota that inhabit the shoreline, a pocket beach and habitat bench were created in shallow nearshore waters with plantings of vegetation in the uplands and placement of gravel and driftwood on the beach. These features replaced relatively unproductive armored seawall and riprap shoreline, with an overall goal of supporting higher numbers and a greater diversity of fish and invertebrates than the existing urbanized shoreline. Biological and physical monitoring of the project site occured prior to construction and in years 1, 2, 3 and 5 post construction. Results from the monitoring indicate that the beach structure is relatively stable and there has been a rapid development of aquatic and terrestrial biota. Many of our indicators of invertebrate and fish use measured in years 1, 3, and 5 post-enhancement have higher values (abundance, diversity, assemblages) when compared to the baseline conditions measured before enhancement, or the adjacent sections of seawall and riprap. Enhancing armored shorelines in order to restore some natural conditions is relatively new from both design and scientific perspectives, and several conclusions from our study will help guide future efforts: (1) Nursery area for fish: Nearshore fish used shallow-water enhancements along armored shorelines. More fish (juvenile salmon and larval fish, depending on the year) were at enhanced shorelines, often with higher feeding activity. (2) Foraging opportunities: Invertebrates that are prey for juvenile salmon and other fish colonized the low gradient, finer-grained intertidal habitats that were incorporated into the armored shorelines. Most of these aquatic invertebrates increased in taxa richness and numbers after enhancements were in place. (3) Riparian value: Certain types of terrestrial insects increased in abundance and taxa richness where patches of shoreline vegetation were planted. Vegetation in urban parks requires routine maintenance, so progression to a more natural riparian zone will be somewhat limited in this setting. (4) Connectivity: Linkages between aquatic and terrestrial zones are broken on heavily armored shorelines. When artificial barriers are removed and aquatic habitats merge with terrestrial habitats, this provides the opportunity for biological and physical processes to reconnect across the ecotone. (5) Physical resilience: In heavily urbanized settings, habitat enhancements have limited ability to restore larger-scale processes such as sediment supply, and this may lead to the need for maintenance. Human use of urban beaches can create some surface sediment loss and structural impact such that occasional maintenance and nourishment may be necessary. It is encouraging that enhanced shorelines can provide benefits similar to those at more fully restored shorelines, and shoreline enhancement should be a management goal in locations where larger scale restoration is not possible due to high levels of urban development. In restoration planning, scientific research can be useful (1) prior to restoration in helping to define project goals, (2) during project design by incorporating data to optimize the likelihood of desirable ecological responses, and (3) after completion of restoration to document performance, to identify problems, and to provide critical information for adaptive management. The Seattle seawall is scheduled for replacement starting as soon as 2013, and using the data collected on design elements at OSP should prove useful for planning other shoreline enhancements along this highly urbanized segment of Elliott Bay. The habitat bench, pocket beach, and planted shoreline vegetation have all had beneficial effects, and these features along with other studied features such as textured and sloped seawalls should be incorporated into project designs. Each of these design elements result in different ecological responses, and using a combination of shoreline enhancements would produce a more diverse community than that along the uniform seawall, riprap, and pier structures that currently exist along the urban Seattle shoreline.
Show more  ↓
FUNDING SOURCES
FUNDING ENTRIES FROM GRANT PROJECT AGREEMENT
TypeDateFunding OrgFunding ProgramMatchAmount
Requested01/24/2012Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO)ESRP Activities$100,000.00
Requested01/24/2012Seattle Public UtilitiesMatch$105,000.00
Allocated12/11/2012Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO)ESRP Activities$99,996.35
Allocated12/11/2012Seattle Public UtilitiesMatch$104,996.16
Spent12/11/2012Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO)ESRP Activities-$99,996.35
Spent12/11/2012Seattle Public UtilitiesMatch-$104,996.16
Grant Project Agreement Totals Proposed Requested Allocated Spent Balance
$99,996.35 $205,000.00 $204,992.51 $204,992.51 $0.00
OTHER FUNDING (Funding that is NOT in a grant project agreement)
TypeDateFunding OrgFunding ProgramMatchAmount
Other Funding Totals Proposed Requested Allocated Spent Balance
Grand Totals Proposed Requested Allocated Spent Balance
PRIMARY SPONSOR
PROJECT CONTACT
ALT PROJECT CONTACT
PROJECT MANAGER
PHOTOS

 
LOCATION
Chum-Pop (ESU):Chum-Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia, Not Warranted
City Areas:Seattle
Coho-Pop (ESU):Coho-Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia, Species of Concern
County:King
HUC12:Shell Creek-Frontal Puget Sound (171100190203)
HUC8:Puget Sound (17110019)
Lead Entity Area:Green/Duwamish/Central Puget Sound Watershed (WRIA 9)
Legislative District:43
Pink-Pop (ESU):Pink-Odd Year, Not Warranted
Puget Sound Action Areas:South Central Puget Sound
Salmon Recovery Regions:Puget Sound
Sections:31
Steelhead-Pop (ESU):Steelhead-Puget Sound, Green River, Threatened
Township:T25NR04E
Watershed Administrative Unit:Possession Sound-N Elliot Bay
WRIA:Cedar - Sammamish
View project on a larger map

Related Projects

  APPLICATION FINAL 
PLANNING METRICS
Area Encompassed (acres) (B.0.b.1)
Miles of Stream and/or Shoreline Affected (B.0.b.2)
Salmonid Habitat Assessment / Inventory    
 Habitat surveys (B.2.d)    
Acres of habitat assessed (B.2.d.2)
0.60acres0.60acres